Testing Latour's App: A User's Guide

I reconstruct Bruno Latour's ideas about science and religion and compare them to Ian G. Barbour's and Mikael Stenmark's models, as well as to the discussion of technology and religion developed by John C. Caiazza and Antje Jackelén. I show how using “Latour's App” enlightens som...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Bigliardi, Stefano (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell 2014
Dans: Zygon
Année: 2014, Volume: 49, Numéro: 4, Pages: 890-903
Sujets non-standardisés:B Mikael Stenmark
B Bruno Latour
B Technology
B Antje Jackelén
B Ian G. Barbour
B Constructivism
B John C. Caiazza
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Édition parallèle:Électronique

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 182796524X
003 DE-627
005 20221220052628.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12129  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)182796524X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP182796524X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bigliardi, Stefano  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Bigliardi, Stefano 
245 1 0 |a Testing Latour's App: A User's Guide 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I reconstruct Bruno Latour's ideas about science and religion and compare them to Ian G. Barbour's and Mikael Stenmark's models, as well as to the discussion of technology and religion developed by John C. Caiazza and Antje Jackelén. I show how using “Latour's App” enlightens some aspects of said models which Barbour and Stenmark themselves were seemingly struggling with, and that Caiazza's and Jackelén's views can be reconciled despite their apparent opposition. The result of such tests is an overall assessment of Latour's proposal. I argue that, under the disguise of a flamboyant and original language, Latour's method is not that distant from those of the other authors analyzed here, and that his discussion might conceal some unwelcome philosophical shortcomings. 
650 4 |a Technology 
650 4 |a Mikael Stenmark 
650 4 |a Bruno Latour 
650 4 |a Antje Jackelén 
650 4 |a Constructivism 
650 4 |a John C. Caiazza 
650 4 |a Ian G. Barbour 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 49(2014), 4, Seite 890-903  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:49  |g year:2014  |g number:4  |g pages:890-903 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1632611562  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12129  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12129  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 49  |j 2014  |e 4  |h 890-903 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235370154 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 182796524X 
LOK |0 005 20221220052628 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#86288A93A0E4E73A565235CBD5D240D9475282DA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL