Noetic and Noematic Dimensions of Religious Experience

Phenomenologies of religious experience have been developed by Max Scheler and via Alfred Schutz’s frameworks of "multiple realities" and "finite provinces of meaning." For both, religious experience resists the pragmatic imperatives of the mechanistic worldview or world of worki...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barber, Michael David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter 2020
In: Open theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: 256-273
Further subjects:B Alfred Schutz
B Theism
B Value Theory
B Max Scheler
B epoché
B phenomenology of religious experience
B Religious Violence
B the religious act
B finite provinces of meaning
B multiple realities
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Phenomenologies of religious experience have been developed by Max Scheler and via Alfred Schutz’s frameworks of "multiple realities" and "finite provinces of meaning." For both, religious experience resists the pragmatic imperatives of the mechanistic worldview or world of working. Schutz’s paradigm begins with a distinctive noetic religious epoché opening the religious province, in contrast with Scheler’s start with spheres of being (especially the absolute sphere) furnishing the noematic context for religious acts. Scheler’s religious act resembles the religious epoché , but his eidetic analysis highlights the act’s distinctiveness, irreducibility to non-religious acts, and immunity to psychological reductionism. Correlating the religious act with his value theory (the absolute sphere), Scheler better withstands the subordination of religion to the pragmatic imperatives and the absolute to lesser values than does a Schutzian ranking of purposes in the province’s form of spontaneity. Scheler’s absolute personal being, whose revelation one must respectfully wait, supports the Schutzian relaxed tension of consciousness. Respectfulness of persons, the social/communal/critical dimensions of religious experience, religion’s need for critique from theoretical provinces of meaning, and the wariness of idolatrously substituting one’s own finite goods for the absolute can all mitigate the religious imperialism and violence to which absolute commitments can lead.
ISSN:2300-6579
Contains:Enthalten in: Open theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/opth-2020-0118