"Blundering Brutuses": Michael Field, Nonconformism, and The Politics of Social Purity
This article explores the contexts of nonconformism and social purity that underpin Michael Field's (Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper) verse drama Brutus Ultor (1886). Based on new archival research, the article explores Bradley's role in the Ladies National Association for the Repeal of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
In: |
Literature and theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 36, Issue: 3, Pages: 229-251 |
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy CD Christianity and Culture KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NCD Political ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Nonconformism
B Decadence B Social Purity B Michael Field B Aestheticism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | This article explores the contexts of nonconformism and social purity that underpin Michael Field's (Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper) verse drama Brutus Ultor (1886). Based on new archival research, the article explores Bradley's role in the Ladies National Association for the Repeal of the Contagious Diseases Act and argues that the play is a complex commentary on the social purity movement and, in particular, on W.T. Stead's campaigning journalism. More broadly, the article argues for the importance of Michael Field's nonconformist background in the development of their oeuvre. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1477-4623 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Literature and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/litthe/frac010 |