Contractualism, exclusionary reasons and the moral argument for theism
Moral reasons take precedence over non-moral reasons either by outweighing non-moral practical reasons, or by excluding such reasons. Several prominent defenders of the moral argument for theism have incorporated the outweighing thesis. They claim we have categorically binding moral duties only if w...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2023, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 18-33 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Moral proof of God's existence
/ Social contract
/ Moral necessity
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
Scanlon
B exclusionary reasons B moral argument for theism B moral duties B Contractualism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1833278739 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230802151706.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412521000561 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1833278739 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1833278739 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1054650934 |0 (DE-627)791685004 |0 (DE-576)405801149 |4 aut |a Rizzieri, Aaron |d 1974- | |
| 109 | |a Rizzieri, Aaron 1974- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contractualism, exclusionary reasons and the moral argument for theism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Moral reasons take precedence over non-moral reasons either by outweighing non-moral practical reasons, or by excluding such reasons. Several prominent defenders of the moral argument for theism have incorporated the outweighing thesis. They claim we have categorically binding moral duties only if we always have most reason to be ethical. Furthermore, we always have most reason to be ethical only if theism is true. On the contrary, I argue that the excluding reasons thesis is correct and that this undermines a key premise in moral arguments developed by C. Stephen Evans, C. Stephen Layman, and William Lane Craig. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Scanlon | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Contractualism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a exclusionary reasons | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral argument for theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral duties | |
| 652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4308481-3 |0 (DE-627)123816688 |0 (DE-576)211106771 |2 gnd |a Moralischer Gottesbeweis |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4077620-7 |0 (DE-627)106079611 |0 (DE-576)209205822 |2 gnd |a Sozialvertrag |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4614891-7 |0 (DE-627)326386890 |0 (DE-576)214278751 |2 gnd |a Moralische Notwendigkeit |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 59(2023), 1, Seite 18-33 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:18-33 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412521000561 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/contractualism-exclusionary-reasons-and-the-moral-argument-for-theism/2D27246E85F09C84DEBCBB4866BDA382 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4267583072 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1833278739 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230802151706 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Moral necessity,Moral proof of God's existence,Deontological proof of God's existence,Ethico-theological proof of God's existence,Moral argument,God's existence,Social contract,Social compact theory |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Contrat social,Nécessité morale,Preuve morale de l’existence de Dieu,Argument déontologique,Argument déontologique |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Contrato social,Necesidad moral,Prueba moral de la existencia de Dios |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Contratto sociale,Necessità morale,Prova morale dell'esistenza di Dio,Argomento deontologico,Argomento deontologico |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 社会契约,神存在的道德论证,上帝存在的道德论证 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 社會契約,神存在的道德論証,上帝存在的道德論証 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Contrato social,Necessidade moral,Prova moral da existência de Deus |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Моральная необходимость,Моральное доказательство существования Бога,Социальный договор |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ηθική αναγκαιότητα,Ηθική απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Κοινωνικό συμβόλαιο |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Deontologischer Gottesbeweis,Ethikotheologischer Gottesbeweis , Contrat social,Gesellschaftsvertrag,Herrschaftsvertrag,Kontraktualismus,Sozialkontrakt,Staatsvertrag,Vertragslehre,Vertragstheorie |