Private evidence for atheism
This article presents an argument for atheism that contains a premise stated from the first-person perspective and that is intended to rationally persuade people who satisfy certain conditions. The argument also contains a premise about what God would do, if God existed, that is acceptable to theist...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 2023, Volume: 59, Numéro: 1, Pages: 97-114 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Athéisme
/ Dieu caché
/ Théorie de la connaissance
/ Philosophie des religions
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Divine Hiddenness
B Atheism B divine absence B Religious Epistemology |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This article presents an argument for atheism that contains a premise stated from the first-person perspective and that is intended to rationally persuade people who satisfy certain conditions. The argument also contains a premise about what God would do, if God existed, that is acceptable to theists and is affirmed in some major monotheistic religious traditions. This article explains how the argument differs from some other familiar arguments for atheism and then discusses some critical responses to it. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-901X |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412522000129 |