Faith development theory: a case for paradigm change
Despite its influence, James Fowler's theory of faith development is in need of fundamental reappraisal. Doubts over Fowler's use of a structural model of human development and the adequacy of his research techniques have been added to in recent years by his inadequate response to the chal...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
2008
|
| Dans: |
Journal of beliefs and values
Année: 2008, Volume: 29, Numéro: 3, Pages: 263-272 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Christian Education
B Faith Development B post‐modernity B paradigm change B Pastoral Theology |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Despite its influence, James Fowler's theory of faith development is in need of fundamental reappraisal. Doubts over Fowler's use of a structural model of human development and the adequacy of his research techniques have been added to in recent years by his inadequate response to the challenge of post‐modern thought. It is suggested that, despite Fowler's position, key elements of the theory are very much in tune with post‐modern thought and if the abandonment of the theory's underlying structuralism were to be allowed, these might be taken to point a constructive way forward. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-9362 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of beliefs and values
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13617670802465813 |