Wisdom and delight in the university

Recent debate about the public benefit of university scholarship, especially in the humanities, has sometimes been caught in a sterile tension between the promotion of engagement and the preservation of detachment, or between learning for public benefit and learning for learning’s sake. The article...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of beliefs and values
Main Author: Higton, Mike (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2013
In: Journal of beliefs and values
Year: 2013, Volume: 34, Issue: 3, Pages: 300-311
Further subjects:B Higher Education
B Wisdom
B Stanley Hauerwas
B David Ford
B Rowan Williams
B John Henry Newman
B Universities
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Recent debate about the public benefit of university scholarship, especially in the humanities, has sometimes been caught in a sterile tension between the promotion of engagement and the preservation of detachment, or between learning for public benefit and learning for learning’s sake. The article traces this tension back to the work of John Henry Newman. By examining recent work on Higher Education by various Christian theologians (Nigel Biggar, Stanley Hauerwas, Rowan Williams and David Ford), this article suggests that we should instead think of humanities scholarship as intensively dedicated to the public good, but as serving that good by pursuing both wisdom and delight.
ISSN:1469-9362
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of beliefs and values
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2013.828953