Style versus ideology: Towards a conceptualisation of fascist aesthetics

Scholars of fascism have mostly come up with generic definitions and tried to define their topic by sketching out more or less elaborated lists of characteristics. This paper tries to come to terms with fascism not so much as an ideological but rather as an aesthetic phenomenon which has to be consi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SCHMID, ULRICH (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2005
In: Totalitarian movements and political religions
Year: 2005, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: 127-140
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Scholars of fascism have mostly come up with generic definitions and tried to define their topic by sketching out more or less elaborated lists of characteristics. This paper tries to come to terms with fascism not so much as an ideological but rather as an aesthetic phenomenon which has to be considered in its social functions. Fascism wanted to put life on stage - Hitler and Mussolini referred to themselves as "artists" who designed the state as a ‘gesamtkunstwerk’. Fascist aesthetics was eclectic in its stylistic preferences: It could deploy futuristic, expressionistic or neoclassicistic devices; using a formalized language of symbols, it did not depict but rather created reality. Fascist aesthetics reinstated art in its premodern social function. Art was not segregated from the public sphere and exiled to museums and exhibitions, but social life itself had to assume the fascist design which also included behavioral patterns.
ISSN:1743-9647
Contains:Enthalten in: Totalitarian movements and political religions
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14690760500110247