Similar Contexts, Different Behaviour: Explaining the Non-Linear Moderation and Immoderation of Islamic Political Parties in Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey

Why do some Islamic political parties (IPPs) pursue a ‘moderate’ political agenda and focus on economic development and democratic reform, while others pursue an ‘immoderate’ political agenda demanding the de-secularization of the state? To answer this question, this paper will utilize a comparative...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politics, religion & ideology
Main Author: Kirdiş, Esen (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2019
In: Politics, religion & ideology
Further subjects:B Democratization
B Turkey
B Morocco
B Islamic movements
B Jordan
B Tunisia
B Islamic parties
B inclusion-moderation
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Why do some Islamic political parties (IPPs) pursue a ‘moderate’ political agenda and focus on economic development and democratic reform, while others pursue an ‘immoderate’ political agenda demanding the de-secularization of the state? To answer this question, this paper will utilize a comparative method of difference and analyze different behaviour, moderation versus immoderation, in similar political contexts, in the authoritarian constitutional monarchies of Jordan and Morocco, and in the secular democracies of Tunisia and Turkey. Based on this comparative methodology and building on the inclusion-moderation literature and religious economies literature, this paper will argue that proximity to power and organizational diversity correlate with an IPP’s moderation and immoderation and show how non-linear the processes of moderation and immoderation can be.
ISSN:2156-7697
Contains:Enthalten in: Politics, religion & ideology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/21567689.2019.1698421