Seeking truth in personality science: reconciling trait theory and psychological type

Two rival paradigms compete for acceptance as representing objective reality concerning the structure of the human personality: the Five-Factor (Trait) model and the Myers-Briggs (Type) model. In this review, the common features of the two schemes are identified and the points of difference examined...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Lloyd, John Benjamin (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Taylor & Francis 2022
Dans: Mental health, religion & culture
Année: 2022, Volume: 25, Numéro: 9, Pages: 817-828
Sujets non-standardisés:B Big Five
B Personality traits
B Five-Factor model
B Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI™)
B Psychological Type
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Two rival paradigms compete for acceptance as representing objective reality concerning the structure of the human personality: the Five-Factor (Trait) model and the Myers-Briggs (Type) model. In this review, the common features of the two schemes are identified and the points of difference examined. It is concluded that a harmonised scheme could be achieved if both sides gave some ground. The Type community could relinquish its contention that every individual has a clear either-or preference for (for example) Extraversion or Introversion. It could also acknowledge the speculative nature of Type Dynamics. The Trait community could relinquish the value-judgements inherent in its current scheme and accept that (for example) introversion is not merely a deficit of extraversion but a distinct quality with positive potential. Given the many similarities of the two present paradigms, a unified approach would have a good claim to be the best current portrayal of personality.
ISSN:1469-9737
Référence:Errata "Correction (2022)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Mental health, religion & culture
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13674676.2022.2158794