Variant Uses of Religious Beliefs to Justify Social Attitudes

The purposes of this paper were to determine: (a) attitudinal valence of six social attitudes considered negative by many interpretations of the Bible, (b) which social attitudes participants considered religion as a primary motivator for their attitudinal valence, (c) which religious variables pred...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research in the social scientific study of religion
Authors: Leach, Mark M. (Author) ; Levy, Jacob J. (Author) ; Denton, Lisa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2006
In: Research in the social scientific study of religion
Year: 2006, Volume: 17, Pages: 197-220
Further subjects:B History of religion
B Social sciences
B Religionswissenschaften
B Religion & Gesellschaft
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The purposes of this paper were to determine: (a) attitudinal valence of six social attitudes considered negative by many interpretations of the Bible, (b) which social attitudes participants considered religion as a primary motivator for their attitudinal valence, (c) which religious variables predicted the attitudinal valence and religious motivation, and (d) qualitative responses delineating their rationale for choosing or not choosing religion as their primary motivator. Using a mixed-methods design, participants included religion as a rationale for their attitudinal valence regarding some social topics but not others (e.g., homosexuality vs. lying). Thus, some individuals mix religious and secular attitudes depending on the topic under discussion. Religious fundamentalism accounted for the majority of the variance, though not for each social attitude. Results indicated that some social issues are motivated by religious attitudes whereas others are based within the secular realm. Reasons for participants’ decision-making justifications based on religious and nonreligious motivations are given.
Contains:Enthalten in: Research in the social scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/9789047411413_013