Sanctification of Learning and Religious Openness: Contrasts across Religious Fundamentalist and Biblical Foundationalist Ideological Surrounds

According to an Ideological Surround Model (ISM), epistemological sufficiency is essential in attempts to clarify the complexity of conservative religious commitments. A test of this claim involved analysis of a Sanctification of Learning Scale in a sample of 619 undergraduates who also responded to...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research in the social scientific study of religion
Authors: Watson, P. J. (Author) ; Chen, Zhuo Job (Author) ; Morris, Ronald J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: Research in the social scientific study of religion
Further subjects:B Religious sociology
B Social sciences
B Religionspsycholigie
B Allgemein
B Religionswissenschaften
B Religion & Gesellschaft
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:According to an Ideological Surround Model (ISM), epistemological sufficiency is essential in attempts to clarify the complexity of conservative religious commitments. A test of this claim involved analysis of a Sanctification of Learning Scale in a sample of 619 undergraduates who also responded to Religious Fundamentalism, Biblical Foundationalism, Conservative Religious Interest, Christian Religious Reflection, Religious Schema, Defense against Secularism, Religious Orientation, and Openness to Experience measures. Partial correlations controlling for Biblical Foundationalism defined a Religious Fundamentalist ideological surround, and partial correlations controlling for Religious Fundamentalism described a Biblical Foundationalist surround. Findings for Sanctification of Learning and other measures identified Biblical Foundationalism as a more open and Religious Fundamentalism as a more closed conservative religious perspective. Defensive against Secularism helped explain religious close-mindedness. Unexpected complexities appeared within an Atheist/Agnostic ideological surround. These data most generally illustrated the greater objectivity that may be available through methods that formally attempt to enhance epistemological sufficiency.
Contains:Enthalten in: Research in the social scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/9789004382640_018