Pro-life, pro-choice and (lack of) proportionality: the legal battle of the swedish midwifes$h

The Grimmark and Steen judicial sagas exemplify the tensions between sincerely-religious midwives refusing to terminate pregnancies vis-à-vis the positive obligation of Swedish authorities to provide nationwide abortion services. As will be seen, at the root of these tensions lied a missed opportuni...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Il diritto ecclesiastico
Subtitles:Studi
Main Author: Corsalini, Matteo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Serra 2022
In: Il diritto ecclesiastico
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Midwife / Abortion / Liberty of conscience / Swedes
RelBib Classification:KBE Northern Europe; Scandinavia
XA Law
Further subjects:B Conscientious Objections
B Steen v. Sweden
B Grimmark v. Sweden
B Religiously-Motivated Employment Discrimination
B Conscience Wars
B Healthcare
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The Grimmark and Steen judicial sagas exemplify the tensions between sincerely-religious midwives refusing to terminate pregnancies vis-à-vis the positive obligation of Swedish authorities to provide nationwide abortion services. As will be seen, at the root of these tensions lied a missed opportunity to make a proportionality assessment between abortion and conscience rights both at domestic and ecthr level. This paper first explores the background of the cases at hand, to then speculate about which alternative judicial routes the domestic courts could have taken to give both countervailing interests their due, hence allowing them to co-exist. This essays then offers a critical analysis of the legal battle that the two Swedish midwives fought before the ecthr.
ISSN:2035-3545
Contains:Enthalten in: Il diritto ecclesiastico
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.19272/202230804017