Is Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy "Really" Unintelligible?
Thomas Williams maintains that the doctrine of analogy is unintelligible. In this paper, I scrutinize and reject Williams's argument for that claim insofar as it applies to Thomas Aquinas's particular version of the doctrine. After laying out Williams's critique, I present an account...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
2021
|
| In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 33, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 3-25 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274
/ Analogy
|
| RelBib Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1843279770 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503082952.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230420s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/philtheol2023221151 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1843279770 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1843279770 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1082099694 |0 (DE-627)847110044 |0 (DE-576)455104972 |4 aut |a Hinton, Timothy |d 1964- | |
| 109 | |a Hinton, Timothy 1964- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy "Really" Unintelligible? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Thomas Williams maintains that the doctrine of analogy is unintelligible. In this paper, I scrutinize and reject Williams's argument for that claim insofar as it applies to Thomas Aquinas's particular version of the doctrine. After laying out Williams's critique, I present an account of Aquinas's conception of analogy. I identify three components of it: a semantic part, a metaphysical part, and a distinctive conception of inference. I briefly explain how all three of these components play a role in Aquinas's philosophical theology. On the basis of these ideas, I proceed to demonstrate how Williams's argument against analogy, understood as a set of reasons for rejecting Aquinas's version of it, fails completely. I end by pointing out how hard it appears for anyone who rejects the doctrine of analogy to keep faith with the idea of creation ex nihilo. | ||
| 601 | |a doctrina | ||
| 652 | |a KAE:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118622110 |0 (DE-627)134387503 |0 (DE-576)209132787 |2 gnd |a Thomas |c von Aquin, Heiliger |d 1225-1274 |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4197814-6 |0 (DE-627)105193577 |0 (DE-576)210117796 |2 gnd |a Analogie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)172465036 |0 (DE-627)697403858 |0 (DE-576)133326691 |4 ant |a Williams, Thomas |d 1967- | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophy & theology |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1986 |g 33(2021), 1/2, Seite 3-25 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)372365930 |w (DE-600)2122985-5 |w (DE-576)443081883 |x 2153-828X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2021 |g number:1/2 |g pages:3-25 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Williams, Thomas, 1967 - |t The doctrine of univocity is true and salutary |d 2005 |w (DE-627)1644281473 |w (DE-576)46592249X |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=philtheol_2021_0033_0001_0003_0025&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol2023221151 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 33 |j 2021 |e 1/2 |h 3-25 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4311607563 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1843279770 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230502175020 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230420||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Analogy,Law,Analogy |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Analogie,Droit |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Analogía,Derecho,Analogía (Lingüística),Analogía |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Analogia |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 模拟,类推 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 類比,類推 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Analogia |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аналогия |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αναλογία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Thomas,von Aquin,1225-1274,Thomas,de Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,de Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,ab Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,ab Aquino,1225-1274,Doctor Angelicus,1225-1274,Dottore angelico,1225-1274,Thomas,Akinatos, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Akuinatos, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinatus, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinus, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinatus, Sanctus,1225-1274,Thōmas,Akinatos, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,von Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,von Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinatis, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,d'Aquin, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,d'Aquin, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,de Aquinas, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Camisensis, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tomás,de Aquino, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tomasz,z Akwinu, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,ho Akinatas, Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Daqui, Heiliger,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino, San,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Saint,1225-1274,Tomás,de Aquino, Santo,1225-1274,Tūmā al-Akwīnī,Heiliger,1225-1274,Thomas,Beatus,1225-1274,Aquinatus, Thomas,Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquin, Thomas,von, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Thomas,von, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,de, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Tommaso,d', Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Thomas,de, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Tomás,de, Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,Saint,1225-1274,Aquino, Tommaso Niccolò,d', Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquino, Tommaso N.,d', Heiliger,1225-1274,Akvinskij, Foma,Heiliger,1225-1274,Aquinas,Heiliger,1225-1274,Akwīnī, Tūmā,al-, Heiliger,1225-1274,Foma,Akvinskij, Heiliger,1225-1274,Daqui, Thomas,Seut,1225-1274,Pseudo-Thomas,von Aquin,1225-1274,Pseudo-Thomas,Aquinas,1225-1274,Pseudo-Thomas,de Aquino,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Saint,1225-1274,Ak'vineli, T'oma,Saint,1225-1274,Akvinietis, Tomas,Saint,1225-1274,Akvinskii, Foma,Saint,1225-1274,Aquinas,1225-1274,Aquinas, Thomas,Saint,1225-1274,Foma,Akvinskiĭ, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,Aquinas, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,av Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,d'Aquin, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,von Aquin, Saint,1225-1274,T'oma,Ak'vineli, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,Akvinski, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,Akvinskii, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,Akvins'kyi, Saint,1225-1274,Toma,ot Akvino, Saint,1225-1274,Tomas,Akvinietis, Saint,1225-1274,Tomas,de Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,Tomasu,Akuinasu, Saint,1225-1274,Tomasu,Akwinasu, Saint,1225-1274,Tomasz,Akwinu, Saint,1225-1274,Tommaso,d'Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,T'ovma,Ak'uinats'i Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akinatos, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akinates, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akuinatos, Saint,1225-1274,Thomas,'o Akuinates, Saint,1225-1274,Tomás,de Aquino, Saint,1225-1274,Aquin, Thomas von,1225-1274,Aquino, Thomas von,1225-1274,Тома,Аквінський, Saint,1225-1274,Pתומאס אקווינאס,1225-1274,Pתומס אקווינס,1225-1274,اكويني ، توما,1225-1274 |