Is Aquinas's Doctrine of Analogy "Really" Unintelligible?
Thomas Williams maintains that the doctrine of analogy is unintelligible. In this paper, I scrutinize and reject Williams's argument for that claim insofar as it applies to Thomas Aquinas's particular version of the doctrine. After laying out Williams's critique, I present an account...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Philosophy Documentation Center
2021
|
In: |
Philosophy & theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 33, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 3-25 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274
/ Analogy
|
RelBib Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Thomas Williams maintains that the doctrine of analogy is unintelligible. In this paper, I scrutinize and reject Williams's argument for that claim insofar as it applies to Thomas Aquinas's particular version of the doctrine. After laying out Williams's critique, I present an account of Aquinas's conception of analogy. I identify three components of it: a semantic part, a metaphysical part, and a distinctive conception of inference. I briefly explain how all three of these components play a role in Aquinas's philosophical theology. On the basis of these ideas, I proceed to demonstrate how Williams's argument against analogy, understood as a set of reasons for rejecting Aquinas's version of it, fails completely. I end by pointing out how hard it appears for anyone who rejects the doctrine of analogy to keep faith with the idea of creation ex nihilo. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-828X |
Reference: | Kritik von "The doctrine of univocity is true and salutary (2005)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/philtheol2023221151 |