Promising Paths and Dead Ends in Evolutionary Theodicy: A Second Reply to Eikrem and Søvik
In this article, I first reflect on the background of the debate between myself and Eikrem and Søvik and make some clarificatory remarks about the term "Only Way argument", which figured in the article that started the exchange. I then map areas of agreement and disagreement between us, wi...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
De Gruyter
2023
|
| Dans: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Année: 2023, Volume: 65, Numéro: 1, Pages: 44-54 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Théologie
/ Évolution
/ Autonomie
/ Le bien
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu NBE Anthropologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Only Way Argument
B Christopher Southgate B Natural Evil B Theistic Evolution B Evolutionary Theodicy B Natürliches Übel B Evolutionären Theodizee B Free Process Defense B Theistische Evolution |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |