Political Theology in Iran: Critiques of the Guardianship of Jurist in Light of Reformist Iranian Scholarship
This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such...
| Published in: | Political theology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2023
|
| In: |
Political theology
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Humainī, Ruḥallāh M. 1902-1989
/ Iran
/ Revolution
/ Political theology
/ Political theory
/ Wilāyat al-faqīh
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy BJ Islam KBL Near East and North Africa NCD Political ethics TK Recent history ZC Politics in general |
| Further subjects: | B
Khomeini
B Iran B Guardianship of the Jurist B reformist scholars B Islamic Government B Democracy B Political Theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such as Abdolkarim Soroush, Muhammad Mujtahed Shabestari, Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari, Mohsen Kadivar and Ahmad Qabel, unpacks these thinkers’ views concerning the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh. It is argued that these scholars’ criticisms of the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh are based not only on their interpretations of the Qurʾān and Shiʿa sources, but also philosophical arguments in which notions drawn from the field of hermeneutics are employed. It is also argued that, in challenging the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, these scholars question the view that the fuqahā have the exclusive right to rule the country, thereby presenting alternative political theories which criticize efforts to politicize religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2021.2022069 |