Religion and Public Reason: An Epistemological Interpretation
Using Audi’s argument for secular public debate as a starting point, which argues for the exclusion of religion from individuals’ public political discourse, this paper argues that it is a fundamental obligation of all citizens in a pluralistic liberal democracy to adhere to a notion of ‘public reas...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Equinox Publ.
2009
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the academic study of religion
Année: 2009, Volume: 22, Numéro: 1, Pages: 64-82 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
John Rawls
B Epistemology B Religion B Public Reason B Robert Audi |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | Using Audi’s argument for secular public debate as a starting point, which argues for the exclusion of religion from individuals’ public political discourse, this paper argues that it is a fundamental obligation of all citizens in a pluralistic liberal democracy to adhere to a notion of ‘public reason’. It does not, however accept Audi and Rawls’ interpretations of the notion of public reason uncritically. Through a comparative study of both philosophers’ principles, a new interpretation of the notion is put forward which focuses on epistemic sources as the crucial criteria for deciding what counts as public reason. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2047-7058 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the academic study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/arsr.v22i1.64 |