Reconfiguring the Emotions in the Psychology of Religion

Watts's general proposition that the psychology of emotion is a particularly relevant area for the psychology of religion is endorsed, but challenged. Although emotions are a part of religion, and share certain structural similarities with religion, they can hardly be conceived of as a model fo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The international journal for the psychology of religion
Main Author: O'Connor, Kathleen V. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 1996
In: The international journal for the psychology of religion
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:Watts's general proposition that the psychology of emotion is a particularly relevant area for the psychology of religion is endorsed, but challenged. Although emotions are a part of religion, and share certain structural similarities with religion, they can hardly be conceived of as a model for religion in the broad human-cultural sense of the term. Similarly, while the disruptive and creative nature of emotions, in addition to the functional, is supported, Watts appears to be unaware of recent theoretical and clinical studies relevant to his argument based on hermeneutical approaches, espe- cially the work of Antoine Vergote on guilt in both its literal and metaphoric sense in human and religious experience.
ISSN:1532-7582
Contains:Enthalten in: The international journal for the psychology of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0603_4