The Argument from Reason and the Dual Process Reply

The argument from reason states that if naturalism is true, then our beliefs are caused by physical processes rather than being causally based in their reasons, so our beliefs are not knowledge—including the belief in naturalism itself. Recent critics of the argument from reason provide dual process...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moore, Dwayne (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Evangelical Philosophical Society 2022
In: Philosophia Christi
Year: 2022, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 217-239
RelBib Classification:VA Philosophy
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1847041833
003 DE-627
005 20230925012744.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230531s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/pc202224220  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1847041833 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1847041833 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Moore, Dwayne  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Argument from Reason and the Dual Process Reply 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The argument from reason states that if naturalism is true, then our beliefs are caused by physical processes rather than being causally based in their reasons, so our beliefs are not knowledge—including the belief in naturalism itself. Recent critics of the argument from reason provide dual process replies to the argument from reason—our beliefs can have both a naturalistic cause/ explanation and be caused/explained by its reasons, thereby showing that naturalism can accommodate knowledge. In this paper I consider three dual process replies and conclude that none of them are successful 
601 |a Argumentation 
652 |a VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Philosophia Christi  |d La Mirada, CA : Evangelical Philosophical Society, 1999  |g 24(2022), 2, Seite 217-239  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1777455340  |w (DE-600)3100949-9  |x 2640-2580  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:217-239 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/MOOTAF-3.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/pc202224220  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=pc&id=pc_2022_0024_0002_0217_0239  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4327670359 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1847041833 
LOK |0 005 20230925012744 
LOK |0 008 230531||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL