Faith, science, and the wager for reality: Meillassoux and Ricœur on post-Kantian realism

This article compares two attempts to return to realism after Kant’s ‘Copernican Revolution’. Quentin Meillassoux, representing the ‘speculative realism’ school, rejects both Kantian and post-Kantian idealism in favour of a materialism based on the epistemology of the modern sciences. But Meillassou...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of philosophy and theology
Main Author: Aspray, Barnabas ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2023
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 84, Issue: 2, Pages: 133-156
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Meillassoux, Quentin 1967- / Ricœur, Paul 1913-2005 / Idealism / Faith
RelBib Classification:NAB Fundamental theology
TK Recent history
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Speculative Realism
B Paul Ricœur
B Idealism
B Correlationism
B Copernican revolution
B Quentin Meillassoux
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This article compares two attempts to return to realism after Kant’s ‘Copernican Revolution’. Quentin Meillassoux, representing the ‘speculative realism’ school, rejects both Kantian and post-Kantian idealism in favour of a materialism based on the epistemology of the modern sciences. But Meillassoux is unaware of the element of choice in his philosophical position, and he does not solve the essential problem posed by idealism which concerns the place of the subject in being. Ricœur, on the other hand, sublates Kant by a deeper embrace of finitude that leads to the self-displacement of the subject, and a ‘Second Copernican Revolution’, one that he freely admits can only be arrived at by Jaspersian ‘Philosophical Faith’. The article concludes by showing how crossing the border into theological faith offers a virtue-ethical perspective on the question of realism and idealism: it is in fact the choice between a childlike humility that receives reality as it is, and an arrogant self-positing that puts the subject in the position of God.
ISSN:2169-2335
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2023.2203144