The X-Claim Debunking Argument and Theistic Mooreanism
According to Stephen Law's "X-claim argument," the theist's acquiring (what I call) an "x-claim defeater" automatically provides the theist with a reason to give up her x-claim belief. Contrary to Law, I argue that, even if the theist acquires such a defeater, it does n...
| Published in: | Philosophia Christi |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Evangelical Philosophical Society
2023
|
| In: |
Philosophia Christi
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | According to Stephen Law's "X-claim argument," the theist's acquiring (what I call) an "x-claim defeater" automatically provides the theist with a reason to give up her x-claim belief. Contrary to Law, I argue that, even if the theist acquires such a defeater, it does not follow that the theist ought to give up her x-claim belief. This is because the degree of justification possessed by the theist's belief may be sufficient to epistemically insulate itself against the x-claim defeater that was initially brought against it. Hence, the theist may be justified in maintaining her x-claim belief. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2640-2580 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "The X-claim argument against religious belief (2018)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophia Christi
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/pc20232515 |