The Hong Kong Reception of Kierkegaard: From the 1950s to the Present
Early in the 1950s, Kierkegaard's philosophy had already been introduced to the academic circle of Hong Kong, which was an in-betweener between Chinese and Western cultures. Nevertheless, while Kierkegaard was frequently discussed by the Japanese philosophers of the Kyoto school, Hong Kong Chin...
| Published in: | Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2023
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Year: 2023, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 329-357 |
| RelBib Classification: | KBM Asia TK Recent history VA Philosophy ZB Sociology ZC Politics in general |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Early in the 1950s, Kierkegaard's philosophy had already been introduced to the academic circle of Hong Kong, which was an in-betweener between Chinese and Western cultures. Nevertheless, while Kierkegaard was frequently discussed by the Japanese philosophers of the Kyoto school, Hong Kong Chinese philosophers (remarkably New Confucians) from the 1950s to the 2010s rarely appreciate Kierkegaard's philosophy. This paper argues that these Chinese philosophers are uninterested in Kierkegaard because their major concerns are the preservation of traditional Chinese culture in Hong Kong, and Kierkegaard's philosophy seems to be irrelevant to their visions and missions, and Kierkegaard's Christian ontology seems to be inconsistent with New Confucian ontology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2023-0015 |