Pitfalls of Pseudepigraphy: Cicero, the Rhetorica ad Herennium, and Raffaele Regio's Quaestio Reconsidered
The main argument of this paper is that the extent to which it has been demonstrated that the Rhetorica ad Herennium was not written by Cicero is more questionable than is currently acknowledged. By revisiting the arguments that have been launched against the text's authenticity, which involve...
| Published in: | Early christianity |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Mohr Siebeck
2023
|
| In: |
Early christianity
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Pseudepigraphy
/ Cicero, Marcus Tullius 106 BC-43 BC
/ Rhetorica ad Herennium
|
| RelBib Classification: | TB Antiquity ZB Sociology |
| Further subjects: | B
Authenticity
B RaffaeleRegio B RhetoricaadHerennium B Pseudepigraphy B Renaissancephilology B Cicero |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The main argument of this paper is that the extent to which it has been demonstrated that the Rhetorica ad Herennium was not written by Cicero is more questionable than is currently acknowledged. By revisiting the arguments that have been launched against the text's authenticity, which involve the alleged demolition of several pieces of ancient evidence in favor of Ciceronian authorship and assertions about Ciceronian and un-Ciceronian style, this paper suggests that the conclusions based on these arguments are hypothetical at best. To account for the undeniable success that these arguments nonetheless enjoy, the paper closes with some reflections on value, the idea of authenticity, and the pitfalls of pseudepigraphy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1868-8020 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Early christianity
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1628/ec-2023-0032 |