A propósito de la sentencia «coram» Pinto de 26 de marzo de 1999: Notas sobre la responsabilidad contractual y la responsabilidad aquiliana en Derecho canónico

The coram Pinto Judgment (26 March 1999) enables an exploration, from a historical perspective, of the scope and meaning of the canonization of civil law in relation to obligations and liability. The canonization of civil laws concerning compensation for damages is supported by the canonical traditi...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Viejo-Ximénez, José Miguel (Auteur) ; Quintana-Afonso, Amado (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Espagnol
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2023
Dans: Ius canonicum
Année: 2023, Volume: 63, Numéro: 126, Pages: 841-878
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Droit canonique / Droit contractuel / Responsabilité / Décrétales / Droit romain
RelBib Classification:SB Droit canonique
XA Droit
Sujets non-standardisés:B Responsabilidad contractual
B Canonización de leyes civiles
B Decretalistas
B Responsabilidad aquiliana
B Derecho de decretales
B Derecho romano
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The coram Pinto Judgment (26 March 1999) enables an exploration, from a historical perspective, of the scope and meaning of the canonization of civil law in relation to obligations and liability. The canonization of civil laws concerning compensation for damages is supported by the canonical tradition. The sources of c. 128 CIC 83 are not to be found in CIC 17, but in the chapters of the title De (iniuris et) damno dato of the ius novum, as well as in the rules of the ius romanum which the Decretalists used to interpret this rubric in a systematic way.
ISSN:2254-6219
Contient:Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.15581/016.126.009