The Essential Content, Integrative Characteristics, and Theoretical Origins of Wencai’s “One Mind” Theory in A New Commentary on the Zhao Lun
The Zhao Lun, authored by Seng Zhao, elaborates on the Madhyamaka thought. This work has had a significant impact on Chinese Buddhist philosophy, as well as on Confucianism and Taoism. During the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368), the esteemed monk Wencai from the Huayan school of Buddhism composed a book ti...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
2024
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2024, Volume: 15, Issue: 8 |
| Further subjects: | B
Tathāgatagarbha
B Huayan school B Wencai B Chinese Buddhist philosophy B Yuan dynasty Buddhism B Seng Zhao B A New Commentary on the Zhao Lun B Madhyamaka |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | The Zhao Lun, authored by Seng Zhao, elaborates on the Madhyamaka thought. This work has had a significant impact on Chinese Buddhist philosophy, as well as on Confucianism and Taoism. During the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368), the esteemed monk Wencai from the Huayan school of Buddhism composed a book titled A New Commentary on the Zhao Lun (hereafter New Commentary), which offers annotations and explanations for the text of the Zhao Lun and employs the “One Mind” theory to interpret the Zhao Lun. Text analysis methods are utilized in this article to conduct an in-depth study of the “One Mind” theoretical system constructed by Wencai within the New Commentary. It explores the essential content, integrative characteristics, and theoretical origins of the “One Mind” theory, thereby revealing the theoretical style of the Huayan school during the Yuan dynasty from a novel and unique perspective. Additionally, we analyze how Wencai integrates Tathāgatagarbha thought and Madhyamaka thought into his theory of “One Mind”. This analysis constitutes, to a certain extent, an indirect refutation of the harsh criticisms of Tathāgatagarbha thought of “Critical Buddhism” in Japan and provides new perspectives and reflections for a deeper understanding of Tathāgatagarbha thought. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel15080930 |