¿Por qué el mādhyamaka no es una forma de nihilismo?: Comprender el abandono de la discusión de Nāgārjuna

Mādhyamaka or Middle Way, the reformulation of the Buddha’s teaching introduced by Nāgārjuna in the 2nd century, caused profound misunderstanadings in its reception context, and it still does among Western readers. The interpretation of its being another form of intellectually fruitless and ethicall...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sáenz Almazán, Berta (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Spanish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Ílu
Year: 2024, Volume: 29, Pages: 25-37
Further subjects:B mādhyamaka
B vía media
B nihilismo
B Budismo
B Nāgārjuna
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Mādhyamaka or Middle Way, the reformulation of the Buddha’s teaching introduced by Nāgārjuna in the 2nd century, caused profound misunderstanadings in its reception context, and it still does among Western readers. The interpretation of its being another form of intellectually fruitless and ethically irresponsable nihilism has always accompanied this demanding philosophy. We will try to answer this objection by resorting to some tools the Middle Way provides. In particular, we will understand what Nāgārjuna meant by abandoning philosophical discussion; we will clarify the self-image of being a practical, useful discourse despite not conceptually capturing the truth; we will explore the new relationship this way of reasoning establishes with mainstream philosophy; and we will review some of its current nihilist misreadings. As allies to clarify the words of the most famous mādhyamika, Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti, we count on Jeffrey Hopkins, C.W. Huntington, Juan Arnau, Giuseppe Ferraro and Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche among others.
ISSN:1988-3269
Contains:Enthalten in: Ílu
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5209/ilur.94173