Die Differenz im Einssein Notizen zur arendtschen "Banalität des Bösen"

This paper takes up the controversial arendtian term "banality of evil" and shows how plurality rooted in non-indifference is necessary for preventing us from acting bad. Distinct from "radical Evil" the "Banality of Evil" is not in itself banal. Evil deeds sneak into e...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cioflec, Eveline (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Review of ecumenical studies
Year: 2024, Volume: 16, Issue: 2, Pages: 336-350
RelBib Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Plurality
B Hannah Arendt
B Non-Indifference
B Oneness
B Banality of Evil
B Two-in-One
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This paper takes up the controversial arendtian term "banality of evil" and shows how plurality rooted in non-indifference is necessary for preventing us from acting bad. Distinct from "radical Evil" the "Banality of Evil" is not in itself banal. Evil deeds sneak into everyday life if being-one with oneself by consulting with oneself on the actions to be taken is missing. Hence, being-one presupposes plurality for the inner dialogue. As a matter of fact, plurality is rooted in the natality of human beings, in being born as being separated and differentiated from others. Nevertheless, conscious plurality as active non-indifference in thought and judgment is yet necessary.
ISSN:2359-8107
Contains:Enthalten in: Review of ecumenical studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2478/ress-2024-0022