Qualitative Testing of Questionnaires on Existential, Spiritual, and Religious Constructs: Epistemological Reflections

Quantitative methodologies using questionnaires are widely utilised across the health and social sciences, including when assessing difficult-to-measure constructs such as existential, spiritual, or religious constructs. The validity of the questionnaire is crucial to secure good research. Qualitati...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stripp, Tobias Anker (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Invalid server response. (JOP server down?)
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2025
In: Religions
Year: 2025, Volume: 16, Issue: 2
Further subjects:B Questionnaire
B Epistemology
B cognitive interview
B content validity
B Quantitative
B Qualitative
B semi-structured interview
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Quantitative methodologies using questionnaires are widely utilised across the health and social sciences, including when assessing difficult-to-measure constructs such as existential, spiritual, or religious constructs. The validity of the questionnaire is crucial to secure good research. Qualitative methods are essential to assess the validity of questionnaires, including a range of measurement properties such as comprehensiveness, comprehensibility, and content validity—properties that quantitative measures have difficulty addressing. Cognitive and semi-structured interviews are the most common qualitative methods to evaluate these properties when testing questionnaires. However, the choice of interview method and subsequent analysis also reflects a negotiation between epistemologies, influencing how the data are interpreted and applied. Based on experience with cognitive and semi-structured interviews to test a questionnaire on existential, spiritual, and religious constructs, this paper critically discusses the opposing epistemological premises for cognitive and semi-structured interviews. It is a relevant methodological discussion for researchers working with questionnaires in health sciences, not the least in relation to religious studies broadly speaking.
ISSN:2077-1444
Contains:Enthalten in: Religions
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.3390/rel16020216