Beauty as a Guide to Truth: Aquinas, Fittingness, and Explanatory Virtues

Many scientists and philosophers of science think that beauty should play a role in theory selection. Physicists like Paul Dirac and Steven Weinberg explicitly claim that the ultimate explanations of the physical world must be beautiful. And philosophers of science like Peter Lipton say that we shou...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Durham, Levi (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2022
In: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2022, Volume: 96, Pages: 239-252
RelBib Classification:CF Christianity and Science
KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
NBD Doctrine of Creation
TK Recent history
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Many scientists and philosophers of science think that beauty should play a role in theory selection. Physicists like Paul Dirac and Steven Weinberg explicitly claim that the ultimate explanations of the physical world must be beautiful. And philosophers of science like Peter Lipton say that we should expect the loveliest theory to also be the most likely. In this paper, I contend that these arguments from loveliness bear a striking similarity to Thomas Aquinas's arguments from fittingness; both seem to presume that the most beautiful theory is also the most probable. To do this, I first layout the explanatory virtues that are commonly thought to be constitutive of a lovely theory. Second, I elucidate Aquinas' arguments from fittingness and show how they work in light of his account of beauty. Lastly, I connect the two kinds of aesthetic arguments and show the extent to which they overlap.
ISSN:2153-7925
Contains:Enthalten in: American Catholic Philosophical Association, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/acpaproc202536167