Grube on justified religious difference
This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs.
| Published in: | International journal of philosophy and theology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religious pluralism
/ Religious tolerance
/ Bi-valence
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Justified religious difference (2016)"
Kritik in "Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity" (2016)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1140589 |