Grube on justified religious difference

This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of philosophy and theology
Main Author: Brümmer, Vincent 1932-
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Published: [2016]
In:International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 5, Pages: 436-438
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religious pluralism / Religious tolerance / Bi-valence
Online Access: doi
Description
Summary:This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs.
ISSN:2169-2327
Reference:Kritik von "Justified religious difference (2016)"
Kritik in "Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity" (2016)"
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1140589