Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity"
In this reply, I take up the challenges the five respondents raised. In particular, I deal with the issues of truth, bivalence (respectively tertium non datur), tolerance, and justification.
| Published in: | International journal of philosophy and theology |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Truth
/ Faith
/ Bi-valence
/ Religious tolerance
/ Justification (Philosophy)
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In this reply, I take up the challenges the five respondents raised. In particular, I deal with the issues of truth, bivalence (respectively tertium non datur), tolerance, and justification. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "A theological alternative to Grube’s notion of "Justified religious difference" (2016)"
Kritik von "What about unjustified religious difference? (2016)" Kritik von "Response to Dirk-Martin Grube (2016)" Kritik von "Grube on justified religious difference (2016)" Kritik von "An epistemic argument for tolerance (2016)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2015.1184916 |