A theological alternative to Grube’s notion of "Justified religious difference"

Grube proposes a framework for respectful dealing with different religions: "Justified religious difference." The author comments on the epistemic setting of Grube’s thesis. It testifies a cognitive approach to religious faith by handling religious faith and epistemic belief as analogous a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of philosophy and theology
Main Author: Brom, Luco Johan van den 1946- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis [2016]
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religious pluralism / Faith / Cognition theory
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AG Religious life; material religion
AX Inter-religious relations
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Grube proposes a framework for respectful dealing with different religions: "Justified religious difference." The author comments on the epistemic setting of Grube’s thesis. It testifies a cognitive approach to religious faith by handling religious faith and epistemic belief as analogous argument. His criticism of the pluralist approach is not very convincing. This framework is too abstract for an interreligious dialogue. The author proposes a concept of religious faith within a web of practices, liturgical rituals. A concrete interreligious dialogue can enrich the Christian faith in its practical styling.
ISSN:2169-2327
Reference:Kritik von "Justified religious difference (2016)"
Kritik in "Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity" (2016)"
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1142672