Grube on justified religious difference
This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs.
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Jahr: 2015, Band: 76, Heft: 5, Seiten: 436-438 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Religiöser Pluralismus
/ Religiöse Toleranz
/ Bivalenz
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus AX Interreligiöse Beziehungen |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "Justified religious difference (2016)"
Kritik in "Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity" (2016)" |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1140589 |