Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence
Doxastic voluntarism maintains that we have voluntary control over our beliefs. It is generally denied by contemporary philosophers. I argue that doxastic voluntarism is true: normally, and insofar as we are rational, we are able to suspend belief and, provided we have a natural inclination to belie...
Publié dans: | International journal for the study of skepticism |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2013
|
Dans: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Année: 2013, Volume: 3, Numéro: 1, Pages: 24-44 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Alston
belief
doubt
doxastic voluntarism
knowledge
scepticism
Williams
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Résumé: | Doxastic voluntarism maintains that we have voluntary control over our beliefs. It is generally denied by contemporary philosophers. I argue that doxastic voluntarism is true: normally, and insofar as we are rational, we are able to suspend belief and, provided we have a natural inclination to believe, we are able to rescind that suspension, and thus to choose to believe. I show that the arguments that have been offered against doxastic voluntarism fail; and that, if the denial of doxastic voluntarism is part of a strategy to defeat scepticism, it is inept, because knowledge presupposes doubt. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
Contient: | In: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/221057012X627212 |