On Naturalness, Innateness, and God-beliefs: A Reply to Shook

Shook (2017) argues that if god-beliefs are “innate,” one is obligated to be skeptical about them by virtue of their mutually incompatible plurality and nativist origin. Second, Shook suggests that even if god-beliefs are not innate, it is still epistemically vicious to believe in gods. Shook also r...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barrett, Justin L. 1971- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2017
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 29, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 374-386
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B God / Faith / Innate ideas / Natural religion / Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
RelBib Classification:AA Study of religion
AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AE Psychology of religion
Further subjects:B cognitive science of religion epistemology god-beliefs innate religion
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1566785308
003 DE-627
005 20180302170932.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180102s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15700682-12341399  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1566785308 
035 |a (DE-576)496785303 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ496785303 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)136980015  |0 (DE-627)588733784  |0 (DE-576)188967508  |4 aut  |a Barrett, Justin L.  |d 1971- 
109 |a Barrett, Justin L. 1971-  |a Barrett, Justin 1971- 
245 1 0 |a On Naturalness, Innateness, and God-beliefs: A Reply to Shook 
264 1 |c 2017 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Shook (2017) argues that if god-beliefs are “innate,” one is obligated to be skeptical about them by virtue of their mutually incompatible plurality and nativist origin. Second, Shook suggests that even if god-beliefs are not innate, it is still epistemically vicious to believe in gods. Shook also raises concerns about using theology to motivate or interpret scientific inquiry. This response essay clarifies the character of the theories offered in the cognitive science of religion (csr), including rejecting that innateness of god-beliefs is a common view. Shook’s primary claims are then evaluated with the conclusion that they are not adequately argued or substantiated. 
650 4 |a cognitive science of religion  |x epistemology  |x god-beliefs  |x innate  |x religion 
652 |a AA:AB:AE 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4021662-7  |0 (DE-627)104649747  |0 (DE-576)208939261  |2 gnd  |a Gott 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4071867-0  |0 (DE-627)104707917  |0 (DE-576)209185139  |2 gnd  |a Glaube 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4142411-6  |0 (DE-627)105613398  |0 (DE-576)209718552  |2 gnd  |a Angeborene Ideen 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4134549-6  |0 (DE-627)105671746  |0 (DE-576)209653248  |2 gnd  |a Natürliche Religion 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)1153645505  |0 (DE-627)1015151884  |0 (DE-576)500375216  |2 gnd  |a Kognitive Religionswissenschaft 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Method & theory in the study of religion  |d Leiden : Brill, 1989  |g 29(2017), 4/5, Seite 374-386  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)34189656X  |w (DE-600)2069397-7  |w (DE-576)100668399  |x 1570-0682  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2017  |g number:4/5  |g pages:374-386 
787 0 8 |i Kommentar zu  |a Shook, John R., 1966 -   |t Are People Born to be Believers, or are Gods Born to be Believed?  |d 2017  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1566785294  |w (DE-576)49678529X 
787 0 8 |i Kommentar in  |a Exline, Julie J.  |t God Belief as an Innate Aspect of Human Nature: A Response to John Shook and Questions for Justin Barrett  |d 2017  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1566785316  |w (DE-576)496785311 
787 0 8 |i Kommentar in  |a Shook, John R., 1966 -   |t Reply to Commentaries on “Are People Born to be Believers, or are Gods Born to be Believed?”  |d 2017  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1566785340  |w (DE-576)496785346 
856 |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/mtsr/29/4-5/article-p374_374.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341399  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 29  |j 2017  |e 4/5  |h 374-386 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2991522038 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1566785308 
LOK |0 005 20180227123103 
LOK |0 008 180102||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042966  |a AA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043024  |a AE 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Faith,Faith,Belief in God,God,God,Innate ideas,Ideae innatae,Nativism,Innatism,Natural religion,Religion of reason,Reasonable religion 
STB 0 0 |a Dieu,Dieu,Foi,Foi,Idées innées,Religion naturelle 
STC 0 0 |a Dios,Dios,Fe,Fe,Ideas innatas,Religión natural 
STD 0 0 |a Dio,Dio,Fede,Fede,Idee innate,Religione naturale 
STE 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,天赋观念,神,神,上帝,上帝,自然宗教 
STF 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,天賦觀念,神,神,上帝,上帝,自然宗教 
STG 0 0 |a Deus,Deus,Fé,Fé,Ideias inatas,Religião natural 
STH 0 0 |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Вера (мотив),Вера,Врождённые идеи,Естественная религия 
STI 0 0 |a Έμφυτες ιδέες,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Πίστη (μοτίβο),Πίστη,Φυσική θρησκεία 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Playing God , Glauben,Gottesglaube,Überzeugung , Angeborene Wahrheiten,Ideae innatae,Nativismus,Eingeborene Ideen,Innatismus , Vernunftreligion , Cognitive science of religion 

Similar Items

more