An Initial Response to the Call for Reframing the History of New Religious Movements
In response to Nova Religio articles by Andreas Pietsch and Sita Steckel, Michael Driedger, and Johannes C. Wolfart calling for a reframing of new religious movements by new religions scholars, agreement is offered that new religions studies will be well served by incorporating insights from scholar...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
University of Californiarnia Press
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Nova religio
Année: 2018, Volume: 21, Numéro: 4, Pages: 88-95 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Nouvelles religions
/ Historiographie
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AZ Nouveau mouvement religieux |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
new religions studies
B New Religious Movements B Religious Diversity B Apocalypticism B Religious Violence |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In response to Nova Religio articles by Andreas Pietsch and Sita Steckel, Michael Driedger, and Johannes C. Wolfart calling for a reframing of new religious movements by new religions scholars, agreement is offered that new religions studies will be well served by incorporating insights from scholars of new religious movements and sectarian movements of the late medieval and Reformation eras, as well as by recasting assumptions that associate apocalyptic movements with violence. It is also suggested that a more sophisticated assessment of pluralism in previous centuries and more attention to methodological issues will provide a firmer foundation for current claims of a growing religious diversity in the contemporary world. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1541-8480 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Nova religio
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1525/nr.2018.21.4.88 |