Religiöse Erfahrung und ihre argumentativen Rollen
Religious experience is a notoriously difficult topic in the philosophy of religion. Suspicions of projection or psychological mechanisms make it difficult to integrate the phenomenon into a philosophical justification of religious beliefs. Swinburne, Plantinga, and Alston are three examples of phil...
| Published in: | Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie |
|---|---|
| Subtitles: | Die epistemische Rolle religiöser Erfahrung$dOtto Muck SJ zum 80. Geburtstag |
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Echter
2009
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Swinburne, Richard 1934-
/ Plantinga, Alvin 1932-
/ Alston, William P. 1921-2009
/ Muck, Otto 1928-
/ Religious experience
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Further subjects: | B
Festschrift
B Muck, Otto 1928- |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | Religious experience is a notoriously difficult topic in the philosophy of religion. Suspicions of projection or psychological mechanisms make it difficult to integrate the phenomenon into a philosophical justification of religious beliefs. Swinburne, Plantinga, and Alston are three examples of philosophers of religion who – each in his way – try to assign religious experience a place in their defences of the rationality of religious belief. Their positions are analyzed and compared, and a common deficit is pointed out. Otto Muck's conception of »Weltanschauung« as the embedding framework of religious experience is proposed as a possible remedy. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0044-2895 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|