Religiöse Erfahrung und ihre argumentativen Rollen
Religious experience is a notoriously difficult topic in the philosophy of religion. Suspicions of projection or psychological mechanisms make it difficult to integrate the phenomenon into a philosophical justification of religious beliefs. Swinburne, Plantinga, and Alston are three examples of phil...
| Subtitles: | Die epistemische Rolle religiöser Erfahrung$dOtto Muck SJ zum 80. Geburtstag |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2009
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Year: 2009, Volume: 131, Issue: 4, Pages: 375-395 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Swinburne, Richard 1934-
/ Plantinga, Alvin 1932-
/ Alston, William P. 1921-2009
/ Muck, Otto 1928-2024
/ Religious experience
|
| Further subjects: | B
Muck, Otto 1928-2024
B Festschrift |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Religious experience is a notoriously difficult topic in the philosophy of religion. Suspicions of projection or psychological mechanisms make it difficult to integrate the phenomenon into a philosophical justification of religious beliefs. Swinburne, Plantinga, and Alston are three examples of philosophers of religion who – each in his way – try to assign religious experience a place in their defences of the rationality of religious belief. Their positions are analyzed and compared, and a common deficit is pointed out. Otto Muck's conception of »Weltanschauung« as the embedding framework of religious experience is proposed as a possible remedy. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|
