On Why Gaita Doesn't Describe Eichmann as Sacred
In this article we examine a potentialproblem for Raimond Gaita (born 1946). It arisesfrom the way that Gaita, in Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception, affirms the value of describing Eichmann as sacred, yet says that he, as a non-religious person, is unable to describe Eichmann as sacred. We argue...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2014]
|
| Dans: |
Implicit religion
Année: 2014, Volume: 17, Numéro: 2, Pages: 85-98 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
EICHMANN, Adolf, 1906-1962
B Sacredness B Eichmann B GOOD & Evil: An Absolute Conception (Book) B GOOD & evil B Religious B GAITA, Raimond, 1946- B Gaita B Sacred |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In this article we examine a potentialproblem for Raimond Gaita (born 1946). It arisesfrom the way that Gaita, in Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception, affirms the value of describing Eichmann as sacred, yet says that he, as a non-religious person, is unable to describe Eichmann as sacred. We argue that the tension in Gaita sposition does not in reality amount to a contradiction, and so we defuse the potential problem. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1697 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Implicit religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/imre.v17i2.197 |
