La non credenza incolpevole: Una risorsa per i credenti?
John Schellenberg has championed one of the most prominent atheistic arguments in contemporary debates. According to him, there are reasonable and inculpable non-believers (who have best reasons in order not to believe), and it is God who is to be faulted for their unbelief; but God cannot be though...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Italien |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Ed. A. V. E.
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Rassegna di teologia
Année: 2019, Volume: 60, Numéro: 4, Pages: 549-567 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu |
| Résumé: | John Schellenberg has championed one of the most prominent atheistic arguments in contemporary debates. According to him, there are reasonable and inculpable non-believers (who have best reasons in order not to believe), and it is God who is to be faulted for their unbelief; but God cannot be thought of as culpable; consequently, God does not exist. The author shows that this argument is only seemingly beneficial to unbelievers and detrimental to believers. On the contrary, at a closer inspection, it is seemingly detrimental to unbelievers and ultimately beneficial to believers. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0033-9644 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Rassegna di teologia
|