Barrett’s cognitive science of religion vs. theism & atheism: a compatibilist approach
Naturalistic explanations for religious beliefs, in the form of the cognitive science of religion (CSR), have become increasingly popular in the contemporary sphere of philosophy and theology. Some claim to provide proof that theism, or religion more generally, is falsified, whilst others suggest th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2020]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 81, Issue: 4, Pages: 386-403 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Barrett, Justin L. 1971-
/ Religious psychology
/ Theism
/ Atheism
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AE Psychology of religion KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NAB Fundamental theology |
| Further subjects: | B
Theism
B Atheism B Compatibilism B cognitive science of religion B Justin L. Barrett |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 172771234X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409123123.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200825s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/21692327.2020.1791232 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)172771234X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP172771234X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1216510547 |0 (DE-627)1727714482 |4 aut |a Morris, Heather | |
| 109 | |a Morris, Heather | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Barrett’s cognitive science of religion vs. theism & atheism |b a compatibilist approach |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Naturalistic explanations for religious beliefs, in the form of the cognitive science of religion (CSR), have become increasingly popular in the contemporary sphere of philosophy and theology. Some claim to provide proof that theism, or religion more generally, is falsified, whilst others suggest that their theories are compatible with holding religious beliefs. In the following, I focus on the CSR of Justin L. Barrett, in order to argue that this particular naturalistic explanation can be seen to be compatible with both theism and atheism. Although Barrett is a proponent of his CSR’s compatibility with theism, and his work appears to imply that he is an incompatibilist when it comes to atheism and CSR, it is not immediately clear whether: (i) his CSR is definitely compatible with theism; and, (ii) why it should be seen as incompatible with atheism. I investigate these questions, utilising and extending research and tools from David Leech and Aku Visala, to argue for the conclusion that Barrett’s CSR is compatible with both theism and atheism, despite what his work implies. I consider the impact this has on the broader sphere of CSR, naturalistic explanations, and different religious worldviews. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a Atheismus | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive science of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justin L. Barrett | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Compatibilism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 652 | |a AB:AE:KAJ:NAB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)136980015 |0 (DE-627)588733784 |0 (DE-576)188967508 |2 gnd |a Barrett, Justin L. |d 1971- |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049418-4 |0 (DE-627)106187090 |0 (DE-576)20908197X |2 gnd |a Religionspsychologie |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4003364-8 |0 (DE-627)106389815 |0 (DE-576)208851305 |2 gnd |a Atheismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of philosophy and theology |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2013 |g 81(2020), 4, Seite 386-403 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)731333985 |w (DE-600)2692945-4 |w (DE-576)381266621 |x 2169-2335 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:81 |g year:2020 |g number:4 |g pages:386-403 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2020.1791232 |x Resolving-System |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3742441175 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 172771234X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220304090659 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200825||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043024 |a AE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050926 |a NAB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Atheism,Atheism,Religious psychology,Psychology of Religion,Religion,Theism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Athéisme,Athéisme,Psychologie des religions,Théisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ateísmo,Ateísmo,Psicología de la religión,Teísmo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Ateismo,Ateismo,Psicologia della religione,Teismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教心理学,无神论,有神论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教心理學,有神論,無神論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ateísmo,Ateísmo,Psicologia da religião,Teísmo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Атеизм (мотив),Атеизм,Психология религии,Теизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αθεϊσμός (μοτίβο),Αθεϊσμός,Θεϊσμός,Ψυχολογία της θρησκείας |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Barrett, Justin,1971- , Gottlosigkeit |