Sergius Bulgakov's Critique of N. F. Fedorov's Technologized Resurrection (and Why It Still Matters for the Christian Dialogue with Transhumanism)

Sergius Bulgakov (1871-1944) was one of the centrally important Russian Orthodox theologians of the past century. His theological system (Sophiology) is among the most detailed and comprehensive attempts at a novel, Orthodox systematic theology developed in engagement with western philosophical and...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Dumsday, Travis (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
Dans: Zygon
Année: 2020, Volume: 55, Numéro: 4, Pages: 853-874
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Bulgakov, Sergej Nikolaevič 1871-1944 / Résurrection / Transhumanisme / Fedorov, Nikolaj F. 1828-1903
RelBib Classification:KDF Église orthodoxe
NBQ Eschatologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Futurism
B Transhumanism
B Technology
B Magic
B Science
B Eschatology
B Orthodoxy
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:Sergius Bulgakov (1871-1944) was one of the centrally important Russian Orthodox theologians of the past century. His theological system (Sophiology) is among the most detailed and comprehensive attempts at a novel, Orthodox systematic theology developed in engagement with western philosophical and theological movements. His first major work of theology, Unfading Light (1917), incorporates an early Orthodox critique of the radical Christian transhumanism propounded by Nikolai Fedorovich Fedorov (1829-1903). Fedorov had developed an account of humanity's prospects for a technologically facilitated eschatology. The goals of this article are: (1) to provide a concise summary Fedorov's ideas on technologized resurrection; (2) to provide an overview of Bulgakov's sympathetic critique of Fedorov's model; and (3) to discuss the ongoing relevance of that critique vis-à-vis current and future Christian dialogue with the transhumanist movement.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contient:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12642