No Trouble: A Reply to Wielenberg
Eric Wielenberg's two alleged contradictions in my view of God, time, and creation are easily resolved. The first is dissolved by appreciating that God's power to create the universe is a modal property which God may possess even if He never in fact exercises that power. The second contra...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2021]
|
| In: |
TheoLogica
Jahr: 2021, Band: 5, Heft: 1, Seiten: 89-92 |
| RelBib Classification: | NBC Gotteslehre NBD Schöpfungslehre VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Creation
B Kalām cosmological argument B Time B Eternity B Wielenberg |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Eric Wielenberg's two alleged contradictions in my view of God, time, and creation are easily resolved. The first is dissolved by appreciating that God's power to create the universe is a modal property which God may possess even if He never in fact exercises that power. The second contradiction evaporates once one adopts a relational view of time. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "Craig's Contradictory "Kalam" (2021)"
Kritik in "A Temporal First Cause? (2021)" |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v4i3.58143 |
