Empirical Adequacy of Lofland's Conversion Model
The adequacy of Lofland's model of conversion has been questioned by Seggar and Kunz; but their data were inappropriate for assessing the model because they dealt neither with conversion to a deviant perspective nor with psychological conversion. The present study of a unique group of young &qu...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Springer
1977
|
In: |
Review of religious research
Jahr: 1977, Band: 18, Heft: 3, Seiten: 282-287 |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | The adequacy of Lofland's model of conversion has been questioned by Seggar and Kunz; but their data were inappropriate for assessing the model because they dealt neither with conversion to a deviant perspective nor with psychological conversion. The present study of a unique group of young "born again" Christians, a group considered "deviant," suggests that extreme characteristics of Lofland's subjects led him to identify and order the "steps" in his model too narrowly. A revised model of conversion is presented. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-4866 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Review of religious research
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/3510217 |