Debunking Arguments from Insensitivity
Heightened awareness of the origins of our moral judgments pushes many in the direction of moral skepticism, in the direction of thinking we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments on a realist understanding of the moral truths. A classic debunking argument fleshes out this worry: the best ex...
Publié dans: | International journal for the study of skepticism |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
2017
|
Dans: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
|
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Jugement moral
/ Réalisme moral
/ Scepticisme
|
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments
moral skepticism
epistemic sensitivity
epistemic reliability
moral explanations
Richard Joyce
|
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Résumé: | Heightened awareness of the origins of our moral judgments pushes many in the direction of moral skepticism, in the direction of thinking we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments on a realist understanding of the moral truths. A classic debunking argument fleshes out this worry: the best explanation of our moral judgments does not appeal to their truth, so we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments. But it is unclear how to get from the explanatory premise to the debunking conclusion. This paper shows how to get from here to there by way of epistemic insensitivity. First, we reconstruct Richard Joyce’s evolutionary debunking argument from insensitivity. Second, we raise epistemological difficulties for Joyce’s argument. Third, we develop and defend a new debunking argument from insensitivity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
Contient: | In: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22105700-20171195 |