Debunking Arguments from Insensitivity

Heightened awareness of the origins of our moral judgments pushes many in the direction of moral skepticism, in the direction of thinking we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments on a realist understanding of the moral truths. A classic debunking argument fleshes out this worry: the best ex...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:International journal for the study of skepticism
Auteur principal: Braddock, Matthew (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2017
Dans: International journal for the study of skepticism
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Jugement moral / Réalisme moral / Scepticisme
Sujets non-standardisés:B Evolutionary Debunking Arguments moral skepticism epistemic sensitivity epistemic reliability moral explanations Richard Joyce
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Heightened awareness of the origins of our moral judgments pushes many in the direction of moral skepticism, in the direction of thinking we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments on a realist understanding of the moral truths. A classic debunking argument fleshes out this worry: the best explanation of our moral judgments does not appeal to their truth, so we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments. But it is unclear how to get from the explanatory premise to the debunking conclusion. This paper shows how to get from here to there by way of epistemic insensitivity. First, we reconstruct Richard Joyce’s evolutionary debunking argument from insensitivity. Second, we raise epistemological difficulties for Joyce’s argument. Third, we develop and defend a new debunking argument from insensitivity.
ISSN:2210-5700
Contient:In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22105700-20171195