The eclipse of Daniel's narrative: The limits of historical knowledge in the theological reading of Daniel
This article uses Hans Frei's famous image of the eclipse' of biblical narrative to explore the link between situating the book of Daniel historically and grasping its theological point(s). The critical/conservative stand-off over the book of Daniel is rehearsed by way of key agenda-setti...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Scottish journal of theology
Année: 2017, Volume: 70, Numéro: 3, Pages: 264-277 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Bibel. Daniel
/ Exégèse
/ Historicité
/ Théologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | FA Théologie HB Ancien Testament TC Époque pré-chrétienne |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theological Interpretation
B Hans Frei B F. W. Farrar B ascriptive reading B Daniel |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This article uses Hans Frei's famous image of the eclipse' of biblical narrative to explore the link between situating the book of Daniel historically and grasping its theological point(s). The critical/conservative stand-off over the book of Daniel is rehearsed by way of key agenda-setting Victorian voices, and it is then argued that Frei's perspective allows the reader to move on from assessing descriptive accuracy towards focusing on ascriptive purpose(s). Various examples of how such an ascriptive approach might clarify Daniel are considered, including specific attention to the complexities of Daniel 11's problematic relationship to what did and did not happen to Antiochus Epiphanes. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003693061700028X |