Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity"
In this reply, I take up the challenges the five respondents raised. In particular, I deal with the issues of truth, bivalence (respectively tertium non datur), tolerance, and justification.
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Année: 2015, Volume: 76, Numéro: 5, Pages: 458-486 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Vérité
/ Foi
/ Bivalence
/ Tolérance religieuse
/ Justification (Philosophie)
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AX Dialogue interreligieux |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In this reply, I take up the challenges the five respondents raised. In particular, I deal with the issues of truth, bivalence (respectively tertium non datur), tolerance, and justification. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "A theological alternative to Grube’s notion of "Justified religious difference" (2016)"
Kritik von "What about unjustified religious difference? (2016)" Kritik von "Response to Dirk-Martin Grube (2016)" Kritik von "Grube on justified religious difference (2016)" Kritik von "An epistemic argument for tolerance (2016)" |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2015.1184916 |